WACO, Texas – The final day of campaigning in the Texas primary took an unexpected turn as reports of U.S. and Israeli strikes against Iran rippled across the state. Here in Waco, where candidates made their last-ditch appeals to voters, the news hung heavy in the air, prompting a range of reactions, or in some cases, a conspicuous avoidance of the topic.
Iran War Fears ERUPT! Texas Primary Campaign in CH...
Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton, known for his staunch conservative stance, held a lunchtime rally at a local Waco eatery. In a 15-minute speech that was supposed to energize his base, the elephant in the room – the strikes – received only the briefest of acknowledgements. When pressed about whether President Trump had clearly articulated the aims of the military action, Paxton played it coy.
“An open-ended war? I don’t have any intelligence, but I don’t think that’s Trump’s idea,” Paxton said, walking a careful tightrope. “He wants to get this over with.” It was a cautious statement, reflecting perhaps the delicate balance of appealing to Trump’s base without fully endorsing a potentially unpopular escalation.
At George's Restaurant and Bar, a Waco institution, Paxton’s supporters seemed more enthusiastic about the strikes. Connie Stamps, a Waco resident, told me she believed the action, especially the targeting of Iranian leadership, “is going to be good for the whole world.” That kind of unwavering support is what candidates like Paxton are banking on.
Senator John Cornyn, facing his own primary challengers, took a slightly different tack. He voiced support for the attack, even though the Trump administration launched it without seeking the typical congressional nod. However, when asked about the clarity of Trump's explanation, Cornyn pivoted.
“We'll have a debate in Congress about what the goals and objectives are,” Cornyn said, before quickly adding, "I am completely satisfied in the president’s explanation.” It felt like a verbal dance, acknowledging potential concerns while ultimately backing the President. Cornyn pointed to Trump's video announcement, calling it "a cogent and good explanation," while also predicting "more debate" to come. A sentiment Vietnam veteran Elton Hartwich wholeheartedly echoed.
Not everyone agreed. David Ozuna, a New Braunfels resident who attended Cornyn's event, expressed deep reservations. Ozuna, who has family members who served in the military, some injured, argued that Trump hadn’t provided a sufficient rationale or clear objective for the strikes.
“I think that we as citizens, before we send our sons and daughters, mothers and fathers to support this thing, deserve to have a good explanation as to what we’re doing, what the objective is and where we’re going," Ozuna stated, his voice filled with emotion. The weight of past sacrifices clearly colored his perspective.
On the Democratic side, Senate hopeful James Talarico, locked in a primary battle with Rep. Jasmine Crockett, briefly addressed the conflict at a University of Houston rally, mentioning the tragic deaths of three U.S. service members. Meanwhile, Charles Padmore of Houston condemned the strikes as “absolutely horrible,” asserting, “It shouldn't have happened. It's illegal. We're the aggressor." It's clear that the unfolding events in Iran have added another layer of complexity to an already tense and competitive primary race.
Comments
Please sign in with Google to post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!